JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.eecake to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agoEveryone uses 4d chess as the example of more intense gambits when 3d chess should suffice because chess is a 2d gamemessage-squaremessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up1128arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1123arrow-down1message-squareEveryone uses 4d chess as the example of more intense gambits when 3d chess should suffice because chess is a 2d gameJeSuisUnHombre@lemm.eecake to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square29linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaretreadful@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up36·1 year ago 3d chess is a thing. It’s annoying to play.
minus-squareAmbiance6195@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoThat does not look fun to play.
minus-squareMelmi@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoIf you think this is annoying to play, try simulating 4D chess by lining up four of these 3D chess sets
minus-squareMummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoBut 5D chess is really fun
3d chess is a thing. It’s annoying to play.
That does not look fun to play.
If you think this is annoying to play, try simulating 4D chess by lining up four of these 3D chess sets
But 5D chess is really fun