Most people know at this point that when searching for a popular software package to download, you should be very careful to avoid clicking on any of the search ads that appear, as this has become an extremely common vector for distributing malware to unsuspecting users.

If you thought that you could identify these malicious ads by checking the URL below the ad to see if it directs to the legitimate site, think again! Malware advertisers have found a way to use Google’s Ad platform to fake the URL shown with the ad to make it appear like a legitimate ad for the product when in fact, clicking the ad will redirect to an attacker controlled site serving malware.

Don’t click on search ads or, even better, use an ad-blocker so that you never see them in the first place!

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    And if False Advertising is a crime in print media, why is malware advertising not also a crime?

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It probably is a crime, but large corporations don’t have to care about crimes because they can just pay the fines and be on their way like nothing happened. It’s no more of an inconvenience to them than just a small mosquito landing on them.

      • dan1101@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If False Advertising in web/app ads started being prosecuted, the whole Internet economy would be devastated. Would probably be thousands of dollars per violation. Just think of all the scummy ads that appear on news sites or in apps. I even consider those “Download Now” button type ads to be false advertising, they are trying to look like part of the page they are served on, they don’t even tell you what you’re downloading.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think there’s a difference between scummy ads like false advertising which is obviously bad, and downright malicious software which it sounds like the ad OP is talking about serves actual malware.

          • Ferris@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You may find such things in similar contexts, though I would believe that an ad service willing to serve either would hammer you faster for malicious payloads than confusing download advertisement misdirects.

            I should probably read the article. If the title isn’t misleading, it is possible to use google referral urls as a masking service and pay for visibility on the link :/

    • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because Google has gotten the law steuctured such that THEY aren’t liable for false advertisements they host and serve.

      If I posted an ad that was blatantly false on Google, legally I’m the one liable, not Google.

      It’s ass backwards, Google should be on the hook for this and should have to curate advertisements. Especially when so any of them are not just fake but are openly malicious