• AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No, I’m not making assumptions. You did that by automatically assuming young people wouldn’t vote. I even said “whatever it is that you’re doing” in my last comment. Does that sound like an assumption to you?

    I don’t care who you are. Your original attitude will not cause the younger vote to want to turn out. You are working against your interests (that is, if you want the dems to win, in which case, sure, I assumed that is what you wanted).

    • radivojevic@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Statistics show that range is less likely to vote. It’s not saying anything other than that or making any assumptions as to why.

      • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Statistics are trending in the other direction. Why not talk about that instead of demoralizing the young voter base any further?

        • radivojevic@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why not just supply information on the contrary, instead of carrying on with insults?

          Because you like to fight more than you like to defend the young voters.

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Can you point me to the insult, please?

            You seem to be missing my point. I don’t care about you enough to argue with you. You aren’t going to get young people on your side by telling them that they’re the problem. Do you not want to improve these stats you keep bringing up? Apparently not, but if you did actually care about that, you’d have more empathy and understanding rather than just saying that young people aren’t going to vote.

              • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Then you ignorantly don’t have empathy for those that have been systematically disenfranchised by strict GOP-led voter laws, gerrymandering, and oppression. You could get angry about people voting for the GOP. You could get angry about idiots parting ways with their money to donate to super pacs. You could get angry about so many other things, but here you are, getting angry because someone online told you to have some empathy for another age group that was disenfranchised.

                • radivojevic@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  … I’m not angry at all? No vote, no voice. Sad you aren’t being heard? VOTE! Frankly, I can’t think of a single reason not to vote.

                  • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Huh, you sure sounded angry when you double commented and said I insulted you.

                    I think that might be part of the problem, you can’t see the barriers that young people and POC in red states encounter. But just because YOU haven’t experienced grappling with disenfranchisement, doesn’t mean it isn’t there for others. You don’t seem to understand that many young people can’t vote because of that.

                    Once again, before you try to move the goal posts once more, the point is that telling disenfranchised people who are not able will not get them on your side and motivate them to get past the cards they have been given. You are being counterproductive to your desire of wanting people to vote when you do that.

        • radivojevic@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Here,

          1. 18-24 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 51.4% • Population: 9.5%
          2. 25-34 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 57% • Population: 13.5%
          3. 35-44 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 63% • Population: 12.5%
          4. 45-54 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 67% • Population: 12.8%
          5. 55-64 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 72% • Population: 12.6%
          6. 65-74 years old • Voter turnout: Approximately 76% • Population: 10%
          7. 75 and older • Voter turnout: Approximately 70% • Population: 6.4%

          Edit:

          Here are the percentages of 18-34 year olds who voted by year over the past 20 years:

          •	2004: 47.9%
          •	2006: 24.0%
          •	2008: 51.1%
          •	2010: 20.4%
          •	2012: 45.0%
          •	2014: 19.9%
          •	2016: 50.0%
          •	2018: 30.1%
          •	2020: 57.3%
          •	2022: 27.5%