feddit.de has been giving “Server error” for some time but I read that the server is still working when using a Lemmy app. Tried the Photon front-end today and choosing feddit.de as instance.

My question (I’m just curious, I have no account on feddit.de) is : Can an alternative front-end on their server co-exist with the other server software ? I guess it would be a matter of installing Photon and then point nginx configuration to that. Or am I missing something crucial ?

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is not that the regular frontend doesn’t work and alternative frontends do, it is that half of the stuff on their server (including image uploads and the frontend) don’t work because the admin has no time to deal with it. The problem isn’t the software used but the lack of maintenance.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Isn’t there a software issue if it breaks with time unless you maintain it? What has happened more specifically? Memory leaks?

      • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The server’s hard drive filled up completely from image uploads, which in turn corrupted the database.
        By the time the admin noticed it and had time to troubleshoot, the automated backup process had replicated the corrupted database, overwriting all backups that had a still-functioning database.
        There was some personal event in the admin’s life as well as a long planned vacation at that time.

        The lesson to be learned here is that a private server administrated by a single person in their spare time isn’t something you can rely on.
        The Feddit community is currently trying to found an organisation that can share the administrative load and is able to receive donations.

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          hard drive filled up completely from image uploads, which in turn corrupted the database

          This is so baffling to me. How does this happen? There needs to be checks in place so that this can’t happen ffs lol. No space left on the device to complete the write? Abort. Or like, starting to run out of space => stop accepting new content until fixed, to protect the integrity of the data. Something.

          Anyway, I hope they manage to find a solution to sharing the load of work! 🙏😌

          • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can set up safeguards against this. You can also make sure some of your backups are never overwritten. But you have to do it in advance.

      • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Memory leaks?

        Possible, but much more likely is disk full. Not a bug, just something that happens…

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Good point, didn’t think of that. That’s not an issue with the software. Although, one could argue that it should not break down and become unresponsive.

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            A lot of software writes to log files or temporary files or lock files or database transaction logs as part of its normal function and when those writes fail due to a full disk the software doesn’t work anymore.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s bad software then, right? The inability to write to disk shouldn’t cause the software to lose all functionality. Unless that’s its only function, or somehow depends on it for proper functioning. 🤷‍♂️

              • Jarvis2323@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                No. Every good software program should write at least logs to disk. Every good database writes to disk. Add a new post, db will commit to the db and the db will grow in size.

                Name any decent sized program where new content is added and I guarantee it writes to disk and will fail eventually if not maintained.

                • Victor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Nice down vote. Let’s discuss instead.

                  I’m saying that the server shouldn’t go down just because new content can’t be added. You should get maybe a 500-series REST response or something. Not… nothing. Ideally it should write to disk. Ideally it should allow new content to be added. But uptime and content access is still more important than being able to write to disk. It should warn the admin of the serious errors, and explain to the user in some diplomatic/apologetic manner. But never go down completely. That’s not resilient at all.

                  That’s my opinion. 👍

                  • Jarvis2323@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    For the record I did not downvote.

                    But I capitulate on your point. It would be great if every piece of software was written with resilience and uptime in mind.

                    As a former sysadmin that sounds like a dream. But I don’t think I have ever seen that with any mainstream program that I’ve had responsibility for. Does that mean all those programs were bad? I don’t think so. We wouldn’t need sysadmins if all programs were written the way you describe.

                    Programs can be written to auto rotate their logs, compact and reindex their db’s. Using browser updates as an example, they can even safely auto update and revert back on failure.

                    How many programs actually do these things? My experience is next to 0. But I wouldn’t call them all bad or poorly written programs.

                  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Fun fact: Old school admins used to write a large-ish (~5% hdd space) file of random data to the drive right after installing the server. If the hard drive ran full without anyone noticing, you could just delete the file to get some breathing room to deal with the issue. It’s a very crude alarm system, but one you WILL notice when it goes off even if you ignore all emails.

                  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’m almost positive it did warn the admin in some way, but the admin was afk for weeks and didn’t see the warnings.