China may also have provided Iran with a long-range early-warning radar that spots stealth aircraft meant to evade detection, people familiar with the matter tell NBC News
Describe your experience and why you think considering nuance in a situation means agreeing or disagreeing to a “side” rather than analyzing the gray of every situation.
Even if you accept a Settlers-style critique of the U.S. working class, it still does not follow that all participants in an imperial institution have identical agency, power, or culpability.
No one claimed they are equally culpable, I’m not interested in examining the marginal culpability of settlers and fascists. You’re inventing arguments to contend with because your understanding of theoretical concepts is shallow
“I’m not interested in examining distinctions” is not a rebuttal to being accused of flattening distinctions. It is a confession.
My argument is not that enlistment is innocent. It is that a material analysis should distinguish recruitment pressure, command hierarchy, profit extraction, and policy-making power. If your framework treats those as irrelevant because everyone falls under the same condemned category, then yes, that is moral flattening with theoretical vocabulary.
I’ve literally been homeless dumbass
Fuck off with your fascist apologia
Describe your experience and why you think considering nuance in a situation means agreeing or disagreeing to a “side” rather than analyzing the gray of every situation.
Go command someone else around, fascist.
Ad hominem is logical fallacy
Terminal reddit brain
Read settlers
Even if you accept a Settlers-style critique of the U.S. working class, it still does not follow that all participants in an imperial institution have identical agency, power, or culpability.
No one claimed they are equally culpable, I’m not interested in examining the marginal culpability of settlers and fascists. You’re inventing arguments to contend with because your understanding of theoretical concepts is shallow
“I’m not interested in examining distinctions” is not a rebuttal to being accused of flattening distinctions. It is a confession.
My argument is not that enlistment is innocent. It is that a material analysis should distinguish recruitment pressure, command hierarchy, profit extraction, and policy-making power. If your framework treats those as irrelevant because everyone falls under the same condemned category, then yes, that is moral flattening with theoretical vocabulary.
Projecting.