They would be in the devastating category.

We need both, these are complementary and compounding ideas. Tolerating a coöp, or its constituent members, hoarding of wealth would lead to similar perversion of social power dynamics.

Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

LLMs are a competency chipper and credibility solvent.

My observation from having to deal with entities which have engaged with LLMs, is any competency or credibility they may have had, is eroded proportionally to their level of exposure. It’s analogous to experiencing a traumatic brain injury.

Losing cognitive ability is bad enough, but it’s devastating when they never possessed it to begin with.

Sans Intelligence.

Sans Intelligence.

The opinion of anyone who is impressed by the function or output of a LLM, to the level they believe it is in any way adjacent to intelligence, should be summarily dismissed, and ridiculed should they persist.

They should also be explicitly quarantined from any decision making process that affects anyone not similarly cognitively impaired.

The financially obese are never sated.

One of the greatest sociopaths in history claiming society must embrace lobotomisation to appease his imaginary god.

Financial obesity is neurotoxic, and anyone afflicted should be quarantined from the decision making processes which affect those not contaminated.

Financial obesity is neurotoxic, an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

The efficacy of a system should be prioritised above its efficiency.

Pursuing efficiency exclusively, or even primarily, leads to excessive optimisation and brittle systems. Sustainability requires efficiency to be balanced with resilience, which requires redundancy.

Resources sitting idle is only wasteful if your goal is maximal extraction.

No one should treat the US as a serious or mature entity until they can prove they’re capable of holding another legitimate election.

Any organisation that is permitted to regulate or investigate itself is intrinsically corrupt and unfit for purpose.

No one should treat the US as a serious or mature entity until they can prove they’re capable of holding another legitimate election.

You’re proving my point, jog on.

Intelligence requires possession and/or demonstration of comprehension, something LLMs are intrinsically incapable of.

If you insist on classifying LLMs as ‘AI’, I’ll concede they are proficient Algorithmic Iterators.

The opinion of anyone impressed by the function or output of a LLM enough to believe it is in any way adjacent to intelligence should be summarily dismissed, and ridiculed should they persist.

Slopvangelical LLM thumping underpants gnomes conjuring cancer to cure cancer.

Economics is the social control mechanism that filled the void vacated by religion after the enlightenment.

Finance replaced mythology. Banks and financial institutions replaced churches and cathedrals. Economists replaced the clergy. GDP replaced God.

Mathematics is the foundation of reality, accounting is a selective subset of mathematics.

Economics is functionally religion that wears a tattered robe of finance which is patched with parts of accounting that economists find useful to support the doctrine of their particular model.

Like religion, economics can prove useful for a society, but similarly it has no intrinsic legitimacy imposing influence on or over those who don’t willingly and non-coercively subscribe to its narrative.

Where’s the flaw in my comment?