mechoman444

Illegal aliens is starting to sound a lot like “Jews”.

I wouldn’t be surprised if our president went off an bankers next.

This is actually true both humans and trees are eukaryotes…

Again YouTube ads? What the hell are you people talking about?

Seriously? Invade Greenland? Who’s going to even allow that. The Whitehouse can’t just declare war without provocation.

It would literally take an act of congress to ratify such an act.

Many city’s don’t allow neon at all. ☹️

Yes of course but it’s marketing data.

Marketing data. We need it for marketing to people so they can spend money.

Don’t you understand! Marketing data!!!

Pervertube. Thisvid. Motherless.

I just realized indicating these websites might have revealed a little too much about the kinds of porn I like to watch. ☹️

Absolute moron. You absolute moron. Once again my argument is about nationalizing a private company.

Is there anything that you’d like to talk about concerning that!

I don’t give two flying fucks who runs space x. Once again. I’m not defending Elon in anyway.

I am expressing my concern about the United States government nationalizing a private company. You’re still making bassless assumptions. Pull your head out of your own ass and actually think about what I’m saying before spouting off at the mouth.

I’m sorry were you talking to me? Because nothing in your response had anything to do with what I actually said.

I never claimed to like Elon. I don’t. I never expressed support for this administration’s policies. I don’t.

My argument is about the moral, ethical, and historically dangerous precedent of nationalizing a private company.

That drug-addled sycophant stood before the most powerful political body on Earth wearing a baseball cap and a T-shirt while the Vice President of the United States told President Zelensky to put on a suit.

Unbelievable.

Where the hell do you get off making wild, baseless assumptions about things you barely understand? What exactly prevents you from engaging in civil discourse like an adult, instead of spouting off like you did in that comment?

Fine if we’re slinging assumptions now, here’s mine: You strike me as a fedora-wearing, vape-huffing, woman-hating neckbeard. Am I wrong? Don’t care. That’s the image your words paint.

If the government actually nationalized SpaceX, the precedent would be insane. You’d be telling every private company working in defense, infrastructure, or tech that if they become too essential, the government might just take it. Doesn’t matter how much risk or capital they fronted.

SpaceX isn’t just launching rockets for fun—it’s practically a branch of the U.S. space program at this point. GPS, Starlink for military comms, launching classified payloads, putting astronauts in orbit. If we nationalize that over a political pissing match between Trump and Musk, we’re basically saying innovation is conditional on obedience.

And let’s be honest—once you do this to SpaceX, you open the door to doing it to AWS, Tesla’s energy grid systems, Google’s AI infrastructure. Any private company that gets too important suddenly becomes “too critical to stay private.” That’s a fast track to killing private innovation in sectors where we need it most.

If Trump’s threatening funding, and Musk is threatening to walk, and the public’s response is “just take the company,” then we’ve officially politicized the tech-industrial base. That’s not governance, that’s dysfunction.

Nationalizing SpaceX would be a Cold War move in a modern economy. It might feel good in the moment, but long-term, it’s a terrible idea.

The precedent that will set and the implications… No… We should not do this.

Yes. But only if people voted in the right way. You’re not supposed to vote it you agree or disagree with something. That’s not how this is supposed to work.

You’re supposed to vote if the context fits the sub or topic.

Youtube ads? I have no clue what you’re talking about…

Joe Biden stepped down knowing he wouldn’t be able to service as president due to his health and age.

Bernie Sanders on his deathbed most definitely would not make a better president than Trump because he’d be dying.

What kind of ridiculous logic is that?

I’m glad you don’t like Trump I don’t like Trump either but replacing him with another old white guy isn’t the solution.

No it doesn’t. At that age no one should be in a place of high power.

Wait. You’re telling me that people in their late 70s early 80s don’t make for great presidents??

No way. 😐

Ehhhh … I use old spice… Maybe I’m a little insecure.

So they’re clearing out the current administration?

They don’t. They’re quite awake. You think that old fart got that position because of ambition? No. He got that position due to politicizing and internal maneuvering.

He was put there specifically so AOC would not have that seat and screw everything and everyone else.

If I recall correctly it was Nancy Pelosi who maneuver to get him into that spot. They knew he had late stage cancer at the time.