Microsexit. No, that’s worse.

Some. There was a video the other day showing one of them emaciated, because there is no food in Gaza.

Fuck you mean “possible”? Netanyahu literally said they’re going to annex gaza

That’s not a requirement for a war. Civil wars, for example, do not have international belligerents by definition.

While true, are there enough Palestinians left in Gaza to mount such a resistance?

SEO garbage has been around for much more than a decade. In fact, before Google got really good at search ranking, sites easily gamed the search engines.

I click the links to the source on the relevant part.

*facetious

I wouldn’t do that without looking at the stock price history.

BS. It’s been falling since Dec 2023. And it’s been around the current level for the past year.

I’m picking up what you’re putting down, don’t worry.

Rising oceans and more frequent, stronger storms kind of negate #2.

Maybe. For photographs, it’s definitely not unconstitutional to make it illegal, because people have a right to privacy (4th amendment sort of, and 10th because they’re state laws).

For Trump, and for non-photographic media, it’s a little different. For one, he’s a very public figure. Another, you could argue it’s artistic, satirical, or critical of him.

Now if you were doing it maliciously, with intent to harass him personally, then yeah that would probably be considered not protected and carry civil or criminal liability.

Yes, but that wording is misleading. Typical web discovery happens when a crawler finds a published link. It sounds like in this case, they’re just giving each and every share link to Google etc, even if the link is not posted anywhere public.