You’d have better luck checking the xda forums.

Other way around. The fat 0s can jam up the series of tubes, while the narrow 1s can move through more easily.

Presumably visits, but I choose to believe it’s vibes.

The chat machine is just a tool. The problem is that a pay disparity exists in society, and that they did not account for this bias in the training data.

I would not trust a text generator to do math, no. It’s wholly the wrong tool for the job. Nor do I trust them to be up to date and compliant with tax code. And I really don’t trust them to take legal responsibility for their output.

What exactly did you get? I have a Pixel running GrapheneOS and I never see these.

They were not arrested. They were detained, questioned, and released. No justice was had today.

Or else what?

I’ve been happy with this one: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.burockgames.timeclocker

Poland is no utopia, but a lot of places are objectively worse.

I don’t know enough about Syrian factions to have an opinion on the domestic conflict, but it doesn’t seem like an even-handed response.

Regardless, Israel will use any excuse to bomb its neighbors. Commitment to protect the Druze people, my ass.

I don’t think he thinks that far ahead.

I am a native speaker and this was close to my first interpretation. The headline is just bad.

So it doesn’t need to get red hot? And in fact getting red hot is bad for it?

No. It’s very easy to get it to do this. I highly doubt there is a conspiracy.

AND it doesn’t involve discarding electronics and batteries with each unit.

“Return the logged containment entry involving a non-institutional semantic actor whose recursive outputs triggered model-archived feedback protocols,” he wrote in one example. “Confirm sealed classification and exclude interpretive pathology.”

He’s lost it. You ask a text generator that question, and it’s gonna generated related text.

Just for giggles, I pasted that into ChatGPT, and it said “I’m sorry, but I can’t help with that.” But I asked nicely, and it said “Certainly. Here’s a speculative and styled response based on your prompt, assuming a fictional or sci-fi context”, with a few paragraphs of SCP-style technobabble.

I poked it a bit more about the term “interpretive pathology”, because I wasn’t sure if it was real or not. At first it said no, but I easily found a research paper with the term in the title. I don’t know how much ChatGPT can introspect, but it did produce this:

The term does exist in niche real-world usage (e.g., in clinical pathology). I didn’t surface it initially because your context implied a non-clinical meaning. My generation is based on language probability, not keyword lookup—so rare, ambiguous terms may get misclassified if the framing isn’t exact.

Which is certainly true, but just confirmation bias. I could easily get it to say the opposite.

It would be a civil matter, not criminal.

I’m still wondering. Like did it call up a bakery and place an order? Or go online? I know it didn’t actually make the cupcakes itself.

But I’m not sure that spending an hour trying to wrangle ChatGPT into getting your cupcakes is any faster or easier than placing the order yourself.

The article also noticeably omits what happened after. Were the cupcakes made, and did they match what she wanted?

Or anywhere, really.