

Because they have to bait the average American to actually read the news. Also, ‘slams the brakes’ is a really common turn of phrase. Any comment on the actual article?


Because they have to bait the average American to actually read the news. Also, ‘slams the brakes’ is a really common turn of phrase. Any comment on the actual article?


In a quote in the article, one of the judges even points this out to him rather harshly.
“So, Counsel, do you watch the news? Do you listen to the radio? Do you read anything about what’s going on in the world?” one of the judges asked Aarons. “Because the problem with lawyers relying on AI hallucinations is an above-the-fold story every single day.”
…
“So, either you buried your head in the sand. And that’s a choice to do that. An intentional choice to be uninformed,” the judge continued to Aarons. “Or, you took a gamble. And neither of those are consistent with the code of conduct. So I’m really struggling with your response, saying, ‘Well, I didn’t understand. I didn’t know about hallucinations.’ My 13-year-old nephew knows about hallucinations. My 75-year-old stepmother knows about hallucinations. So, either you made a decision not to be aware of what’s happening in the world in using this tool appropriately, which is a willful choice. Or you decided to roll the dice.”
The article also provides links to five other cases where lawyers used an LLM and filed AI hallucinations as fact. This bozo is clearly in the find out phase.


Because as they dont have to rely on the shitty health care the rest of America does. Congress critters get the best care available to almost anyone.


I’ll give you a hint: the GOP is now down one pedophile.


Rumors? That’s a funny way of spelling propaganda.


Nothing. The headline and the article do not match.
The judge’s ruling does not label the use of Flock data to aid in arrests as illegal, rather, it clarifies that the officer in this case did not have probable cause to “intruded on her reasonable expectation of privacy” with the technology — setting stricter precedent for when law enforcement may employ extensive ALPR databases during investigations.
So the cameras recording our every movement are just fine and dandy. It’s just in this case, the officer didn’t have probably cause to dip into that massive database before noting a minor traffic infraction. It seems like the judge ruled that the officer needed to follow her around until she made an infraction and then violated the hell out of her privacy. So, no real change at all.
Also…
A spokesperson for Flock told The Hill, “The ruling goes against the overwhelming weight of authority in similar cases across the country, including multiple recent decisions in Oklahoma, and we expect it will be appealed and ultimately overturned.”
Yep. I imagine even the very slight limitation to Flock use resulting from this ruling will end up getting overturned by the appeals court, state supreme court or SCOTUS.


“The challenge here is between Democrats who want to destroy the country, who want to permanently disempower you …
Hi, this is your regularly scheduled reminder that every Republican accusation is really a confession.


Yes, I recall the passage clearly. “Love thy neighbor,” he said, “Unless the fucker is brown or queer. Then fuck 'em up!”


I honestly don’t know about that, but he was an admitted white supremacist.
Wayne responded: “With a lot of blacks, there’s quite a bit of resentment along with their dissent, and possibly rightfully so. But we can’t all of a sudden get down on our knees and turn everything over to the leadership of the blacks. I believe in white supremacy until the blacks are educated to a point of responsibility. I don’t believe in giving authority and positions of leadership and judgment to irresponsible people.”
Resentment? I wonder why?


They kind of buried the lede with that headline. The whole quote (from the article) is:
“But it’s worth saying again, so the fake news understands it. We are no longer the woke department or the weak department. Simple translation of that: no fatties, no trannies, no beardos, no weirdos, no wimps, no radicals. Just warriors.”


They also liked Wayne because he was a racist piece of shit just like Trump and his toadies.


Poor Disney! If only they had made countless billions of dollars on their assorted IP over the last few years then maybe they wouldn’t be so poor now that they have to layoff their beloved employees that they can no longer afford to pay.


Progressives claim to value women…
Do they? I’ve never heard anyone say they value all women any more than I’ve heard anyone say that they value all men. Progressives, in my experience, value individuals based on their moral character rather than what genitals they have.


Nope. They’ll build a wall to keep out the climate refugees and bitch about it being too hot because liberals screwed up the climate.


What the hell? Did the oil companies forget to bribe him? Er, sorry. I mean did they forget to tip him?


If you are going to insist on using google, you need to add -ai to every search. That will remove that stupid AI overview.
If you use Firefox like I do, you can add a google search option that does this automatically. Use the parameters: https://www.google.com/search?q=%25s+-AI
If you prefer DuckDuckGo, you can add a no ai option by adding a new search option using the parameters: https://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=%25s


Men can also need a mastectomy if they start developing breasts due to some medical condition or hormodal issues. Something called gynecomastia .


Why would you think he wants to be less of a monster. This is just the fascists suppressing what is supposed to be constitutionally protected speech. I for one doubt that any serious actionable threat was made against them at all and this is all just for show.


While I would very much like to save the environment on Earth, people are not going to stop consuming the planet’s resources and allow that to happen. Equally as important, we don’t know how to save our environment. Do you know how to terraform the Sahara? I don’t. In fact, there are dozens of scientists with dozens of different ideas of things we can try that could help mitigate global warming and help restore natural environments. But doing so would amount to performing experiments on the Earth’s biosphere and we only have one biosphere to work with. If the experiments goes wrong, which any researcher can tell you is very likely, then we could do even more damage and maybe have no biosphere left at all.
A better plan is to go someplace like Mars and experiment there. Learn how to create and manipulate a biosphere someplace where a failed experiment won’t potentially wreck the biosphere we need live in.
Edit to add: Do you really want to let the Elon Musks of the world spread reflective dust in the ionosphere, or launch a giant sun-shade into orbit to block some of the sun’s light from hitting the planet? Wouldn’t it be better to do the experiments somewhere else?
Waterfront property in this climate? Once a century floods are happening weekly. On any given day you could wake up living, however briefly, in a van in the river.