

They’ll just change the T&Cs later on to retrospectively allow use of the data again.


They’ll just change the T&Cs later on to retrospectively allow use of the data again.


Based on those results, I put the figure at 53.7%


It’s all slave labour RAM, one way or another.


Not to mention - AI aside - these publishers shamelessly exploit the actual authors and creators, seizing control of their work and taking virtually all the profit for themselves.


No it means Anthropic think they have a head start and want to capitalise on it.


You forgot “cancel a bunch of products that were actually useful and had real growth potential in favour of Copilot”


Definitely a bait title.


it’ll be a slow process of negotiating every piece of legislation
Some might say that’s not a bad thing.


Rigging the election won it last time.


Bug fixing is not a reason to enable massive privacy violations.


That much is true.


you can send it to a server
Yes, because web browsers, under current web architecture, allow this.
This is entirely my point.


That can all be done 100% client side. The server does not need this information.


Here’s the information a web server needs to deliver content to a browser:
Everything else is a fucking security hole. There’s no good reason for servers to know what extensions you have installed, what OS you’re running, the dimensions of your browser window, where your mouse cursor is positioned, or any one of a thousand other data points that browsers freely hand over.


Still don’t really understand why browsers expose this data to sites.
Web browsers are just such a massive security hole.


Instant model collapse.


I don’t get it. How can you even tell the difference?


But…but Magic Box™
Hint: It’s Putin.